You will receive an email with your results and a complementary resource guide. In the meantime, here is more background on the HGSC Change Management theory and framework.
Enabling Transformative Change in Educational Facilities
Now more than ever before, K-12 schools and higher education institutions are in the process of integrating health and sustainability as part of day-to-day facility operations and management. In doing so, an institution will ultimately be on a journey to activate, facilitate, and embed new ways of setting priorities, making decisions, allocating resources, and defining success in order to successfully integrate health and sustainability as part of day-to-day facility operations and management.
This process requires managing change, which in turn requires a consistent, structured, strategic, and sustained effort.
Maturity Models: A Roadmap for Change
Navigating the complexities of implementing change, especially in dynamic environments like educational facilities, can be daunting. Change often demands a structured approach, and maturity models offer just that. Maturity models offer a consistent framework for organizations to assess, plan, and execute change effectively.
What Are Maturity Models?
Maturity models are tools used by organizations to assess the effectiveness and sophistication of various processes or areas within the organization. They provide a roadmap for continuous improvement, allowing organizations to identify their current level of maturity in a specific domain and understand what steps they need to take to reach higher levels of efficiency, effectiveness, and sophistication.
A school may already use the concept of maturity models without even knowing it. Imagine a high school initiating a simple recycling program and, guided by a maturity model, evolving the program based on lessons learned and continuous improvement, and then expanding the recycling program to all schools within the district. Maturity models can facilitate a systematic approach to embedding sustainability into school culture, starting in one building and branching out.
Similarly, higher education institutions undoubtedly engage with maturity models. For example, a university that has committed to the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment and is aiming for carbon neutrality may use a maturity model to set clear milestones and systematically achieve and maintain this goal.
Three Ways Maturity Models Facilitate Change Goals
Maturity models assist with facilitating change in the following ways:
- Clarifying the Path Forward: They offer a clear roadmap for institutions, breaking down the change process into manageable, recognizable stages.
- Ensuring Consistent Improvement: Maturity models encourage consistent, gradual improvements, helping organizations build on their successes at each stage.
- Customized Strategies: They allow institutions to develop customized strategies that suit their unique context, needs, and current progress.
Five Levels of Maturity
Participants in the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges Program are guided by a maturity model that consists of five levels, each representing a stage in the journey towards fully integrating health and sustainability into everyday facility operations:
- Level 1 – No Maturity/Not Started: At this stage, there are no clear processes, guidelines, or benchmarks. The institution may be unaware of the need or has not begun any efforts toward integration.
- Level 2 – Initial/Ad Hoc: The institution has recognized a need for action and changes have begun. However, efforts are inconsistent, informal, and often reactive, with success largely dependent on individual initiative.
- Level 3 – Defined/Managed: The institution has established clear processes and standards. There is noticeable progress with consistent practices and an understanding of their effectiveness. Activities are actively managed.
- Level 4 – Managed/Measured: Processes are not only clear but also monitored and measured. Data is utilized for informed decisions and proactive improvements, focusing on data-driven management.
- Level 5 – Full Maturity/Embedded: Processes are fully integrated into the institution’s culture, structure, and operations. The system is self-sustaining with continuous improvement, optimized practices, and adaptability to changing conditions.
A maturity model in educational settings functions as a roadmap, marking milestones from initial steps to advanced sustainability achievements. It’s not just about implementing eco-friendly practices but about embedding them into the culture, curriculum, and everyday operations.
10 Factors Necessary Using Facility Operations and Management to Achieve Efficient Operations, Enhanced Learning + Healthy School
There are 10 key factors necessary for successfully implementing change. These factors can each be given a level of maturity on any aspect of an institution’s pursuit of integrating health and sustainability as part of day-to-day facility operations and management.
| Factor | Definition |
| Clear Vision and Objectives | Comprehensive vision for how facility operations and management will advance efforts to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools, with defined outcomes and reasons for change. |
| Effective Communication | Conveying to all stakeholders the vision and objectives connecting facility operations and management to larger efforts to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools. |
| Leadership Commitment | Commitment from district/institution leaders and school administrators to connect facility operations and management to larger efforts to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools, as well as drive associated initiatives and changes. |
| Adequate Resources | Necessary resources, including funds, personnel, and technology, to support facility operations and management programs and initiatives to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools. |
| Staff Engagement | Active, meaningful, and generative involvement of facility operations and maintenance staff to support facility operations and management programs and initiatives to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools. |
| Stakeholder Relationships | External stakeholders necessary to enable the facility operations and management program and initiatives to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools (e.g., teachers, building administrators, students, parents, vendors, local government agencies, community organizations, partners, etc.). |
| Change Champions | Individuals who motivate others and help drive facility operations and management programs and initiatives to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools. |
| School Culture | Prevailing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors around accepting and driving or rejecting and resisting change necessary to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools. |
| Organizational Structure | Structural elements of an institution (e.g., processes for collaboration, decision making, feedback, training, resource allocation, strategy setting, recognition and accountability) that can promote or hinder progress and change necessary to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and healthy, green schools. |
| Evaluation and Improvement | Regular assessment of progress and strategies for facility operations and management programs and initiatives to achieve efficient operations, enhanced learning, and health, green schools. |
Adopting a maturity model approach to integrating health and sustainability into educational facility operations offers a structured, strategic path towards transformative change. By understanding where they stand and what steps are needed for progress, educational institutions can effectively navigate the complexities of organizational change, paving the way for a healthier, more sustainable future for our students, staff, and communities.